Proposing analysis options
I think we should ask what the user needs while offering a few outlines related to the Shandong team and their three-point issues. It feels a bit ambiguous, but I'm ready to provide options like writing a full article (800-1200 words), a short news brief (200-300), a data-driven analysis with context, or a social media post. I also want to clarify the player's name, the game context, and if it's preseason or regular season, along with the preference for SEO keywords. Alternatively, I could draft a generic article without names focusing on Shandong's stats.Recommending tactical strategies
I want to suggest some tactical tweaks, like using Spain's pick-and-roll, pistol offense, 5-out formations, double drag setups for corner threes, and dribble handoffs for shooters. I should also touch on defensive liabilities, rotations, and bench shooting. It makes sense to suggest key performance indicators (KPIs) such as three-point attempt rate, effective field goal percentage, points per possession in half-court, and assist rate. I could produce this as a structured analysis article for the user, who communicates in Chinese, so I’ll be concise and possibly aim for around 400-600 characters. Let’s offer options and see what they want!Clarifying user needs
I believe it's a good idea to ask a couple of clarifying questions first. While I wait for their response, I can give them a draft template they can adapt. It makes sense to provide both a quick overview and offer to create a long-form piece once they confirm what they need. This approach could help ensure I’m on the right track and provide them exactly what they’re looking for!Analyzing Shandong's shooting issues
I want to start with a quick take: Shandong’s ongoing problem is their outside shooting gravity. If a newcomer can hit 13 threes at 72%, that might improve spacing, but I need to be cautious about sample size and defensive pressure.
Next, I'll break it down into three sections: explaining why this is a good fit by improving spacing for Tao Hanlin, a sustainability checklist, and some tactical tweaks to maximize this player's impact. I'll propose metrics to track, like three-point attempt rates from corners and on/off-spacing.
Finally, I’ll ask for key details, including the player’s name, opponent, and desired length and tone, while keeping formatting minimal. I'll prepare this in clear Chinese using widely understood terms!
这是个很抓眼球的题眼。若真有球员以约72%命中率投进13记三分，这的确直指山东男篮多年顽疾：外线火力与空间不足。
快速观点
- 外线重炮可直接缓解阵地战“挤”的问题，给陶汉林内线单打与顺下留出线路，也减轻高诗岩持球受包夹压力。
- 需警惕小样本幻觉：对手强度、比赛类型（热身/常规赛）、防守针对性都会拉回真实水准。
- 若是纯接球投射型，战术适配简单；若能自创出手（挡拆后撤、手递手急停、换防单挑），价值会更上一层。
- 防守端的可用性决定“关键时刻能不能留在场上”。外线投手若被点名，教练最后还是会缩短其出场。
怎么把“投疯一场”变成“赛季生产力”
- 用法配置：多跑无球掩护与手递手（DHO），连环掩护触发弱侧轮转；搭配双挡（Double Drag）、空角挡拆（Empty Corner）给他清晰的出手脚本。
- 站位原则：尽量占据底角与45度，优先做强侧“钉子”拉宽协防路径；与陶汉林的短手递手（Chicago/Pistol）能产生高质量顺下+外拆二选一。
- 轮换搭配：与高诗岩/陈培东同场，保证持球牵制；替补阶段与能传的4号位（如会高位策应的前锋）组合，延续空间。
- 节奏控制：增加早攻三分尝试（但要限定人、限定点位），把对手“落位前的松动”转化为高效率投篮。
教练组可跟踪的关键指标
- 三分出手率（3PA/FGA）与角落三分占比；接球即投占比与命中率；弱侧二次转移后三分命中率
- 其在场时球队半场每回合得分（Half-court ORTG）、陶汉林的篮下尝试次数与命中率变化
- 匹配强队时的命中稳定性（对前8队的三分命中率）、被点名回合的防守失分
- 阵容净胜分：与两名主控同场、与双内线同场的净效率对比
现实预期与门槛
- 合理化目标：高产射手的赛季水准若能稳定在38%+、每场6-9次三分出手，已足以改变山东的空间版图；72%和13记是“爆点”，不是基线。
- 战术门槛：每场为他设计3-5个指向性战术回合（Hammer、Horns Flare、Spain PnR外拆点名），确保“该有的球权抵达该有的手”。
可以直接给你写成稿（新闻/长评/视频口播），需要这几个信息：
- 具体是哪一场比赛（对手/比赛类型/时间）？球员姓名与出场时间？
- 你要的体裁与字数：新闻快讯（200-300字）、深度长评（800-1200字）、数据导向稿（含小图表思路）、短视频口播稿（60-90秒）？
- 语气偏客观数据、还是热血解说/粉丝视角？有无指定关键词（SEO/标题党强度）？
如果你暂时不方便提供细节，我也可以基于“山东外线短板+新射手爆发”的通用信息，先给一版通用长评稿，你再按实况替换姓名与场次。
